In today's webinar, we delve into the legal implications and ramifications stemming from the SEC's enforcement action against SolarWinds and its Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), Timothy Brown. This case has significant implications for cybersecurity professionals, particularly those in leadership positions. Our speakers, Matthew Rosenquist, Jim Ralph, and Michael Rees, bring their extensive experience in cybersecurity to discuss these critical issues.
Here is the verbatim discussion:
In some cases we've gotten that seat at the table and look what's happened now we have the seat at the table and a lot of cesos aren't under the indemnify policy um even though your CEO your CFO might be your ceso is not so your ceso is sitting alone um and we're seeing what can happen with that and this is a perfect example and again let's let's make sure we're not being the judge and jury here we're seeing the filing from the SEC we see what they have coming to the table they've kind of put their cards on the table and said this is what we're going to charge both solar winds and Timothy brown with um you can look at that and say yeah man it's pretty clear that there's some fraud involved here we haven't seen the other side of that right we haven't seen the discoverable items from the you know you've seen the prosecution side but you haven't seen the defendant side once you see all of that evidence put together and as forensic investigators we go out and we we find the facts and we put the facts on the table then the attorneys start dealing with those facts and they can manipulate and change them and make them kind of go in the favor they want them to go so again let's be real careful not to say hey we're going to be judging jury here and we just we find him guilty because of what this SEC filing says um again for us as CEOs we need to be very careful because this is and there's somewhat of a collaborative effort between the regulator and the Private Industry to kind of work out the Kink so to speak but when there's an enforcement action taken like this it sets a precedent for how the agency in this case C SEC will uh do enforcement and in this particular case uh we've got a ciso that's uh basically uh being reprobated Ed for not sharing uh information at the right time around uh security posture as well as uh not sharing the right information uh in on both counts uh and the enforcement action uh against an individual uh as a ciso it sets a precedent and that precedent has ramifications and that's what's creating a backlash of practitioners saying ho wait a minute here this you know this enforcement action appears to be a bit Draconian uh in enforcing on an individual and not necessarily warranted and then as we peel back uh kind of the layers uh there's some pretty good arguments to support the notion that uh this is not a precedent that is good for the industry it's actually a precedent that is negative has negative consequences uh to the industry so some of those negative consequences include uh potential Chief information security officers interviewing for a ceso role and deciding during the interview process that they're uncomfortable with the potential risk to them as an individual and they step down and say take me out of the Hat you know I'm.
Comments